BETA
THIS IS A BETA EXPERIENCE. OPT-OUT HERE

Breaking

Edit Story

OpenAI’s Sam Altman Says He ‘Changed His Perspective’ On Trump—After Musk Bashes ‘Stargate’ Deal

Following

Topline

President Donald Trump will be “incredible” for the U.S., OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said late Wednesday, adding he has “changed his perspective” on Trump after being an earlier critic of the president, who unveiled a $500 billion AI deal involving Altman’s firm earlier this week.

Key Facts

In a post on X, Altman wrote that watching Trump “more carefully recently has really changed my perspective on him,” noting, “I’m not going to agree with him on everything, but I think he will be incredible for the country in many ways!”

Trump announced on Tuesday a “Stargate” AI infrastructure deal funded by OpenAI, Oracle, Japan-based SoftBank and Emirati-based MGX, which Trump said would help develop the technology in the U.S. and create more than 100,000 jobs.

Altman said he wished he had “done more of my own thinking” and “fell in the NPC trap,” echoing a phrase often used by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who appears to refer to his critics and media outlets as “non-playable characters” (NPCs) to imply their opinions are controlled by someone else.

Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.

Crucial Quote

Altman wrote: “Watching [Trump] more carefully recently has really changed my perspective on him (I wish I had done more of my own thinking and definitely fell in the NPC trap). I’m not going to agree with him on everything, but I think he will be incredible for the country in many ways!”

Key Background

Altman, who donated to a super PAC supporting President Joe Biden’s campaign in 2020, has changed his tone on Trump in recent months. The OpenAI CEO applauded LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman in December 2021 for all he “did and spent to stop Trump from getting re-elected,” suggesting Trump would “still be in office without his efforts.” Altman—a contributor to campaigns for dozens of other Democrats over the last decade—told Fox News in December he would donate $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund, saying he was “eager to support” Trump’s efforts to “lead our country into the age of AI.” His donation came under the scope of Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Michael Bennet, D-Colo., who claimed Altman and other companies used “massive contributions” to avoid regulatory scrutiny under Trump’s administration. Altman fired back, writing it was “funny” lawmakers had never questioned him over his earlier contributions to Democrats.

Tangent

The Stargate announcement revived a feud between Altman and Musk, who claimed the companies “don’t actually have the money” to fund the project. Musk claimed on X he has it on “good authority” that “SoftBank has well under [$10 billion] secured,” while Altman responded by saying Musk’s claim is “wrong, as you surely know.” Musk later escalated his criticism on Wednesday, calling the project “fake” and Altman a “swindler.” A person familiar with Stargate’s funding disputed Musk’s claim, telling Forbes the project has $100 billion in funding from the four firms and other co-investors.

Further Reading

ForbesOpenAI’s Sam Altman Shares ‘Funny’ Letter From Democratic Senators Questioning His Donation To Trump Inaugural FundForbesMusk Bashes Trump’s New Stargate AI Initiative With OpenAI And Oracle As ‘Fake’—Here’s Why
Follow me on TwitterSend me a secure tip

Join The Conversation

Comments 

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Read our community guidelines .

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service.  We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

  • False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
  • Spam
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
  • Content that otherwise violates our site's terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
  • Actions that otherwise violate our site's terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your insights
  • Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
  • ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
  • Protect your community.
  • Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.